
Willem Breuker KollektiefBIMhuis (Amsterdam, 1998)Review by Dan WARBURTON
Near the Leidseplein in Amsterdam is a reasonably modern neo-classical
building with a Latin inscription proudly adorning its arches: Homo Sapiens
Non Urinat In Ventum (which, if your Latin isn't up to it, means, roughly
translated, "intelligent men don't piss into the wind".. The
fact that such a ribald piece of humour (albeit camouflaged as a pseudo-classical
spoof) should be set in stone for generations to come is a fine example
of the Dutch mentality. I can think of no other country in the world where
planning permission would have been granted. But, hey, this is Holland!
You may choose to disagree, but a culture which so openly espouses tolerance
in all its forms is, for me, a mature and ultimately healthy one. Holland
is also proud of its artistic heritage, past and present, and actively
supports it in a way that can make visitors like me green with envy. As
an ex-pat Brit resident in Paris for ten years, I've grown to love the
anarchic little nightspots where new music can flourish (first and foremost
being Montreuil's Instants Chavirés), so arriving at Amsterdam's
BIMhuis was something of a shock. A performing space about four times
as big as the Instants, a superb sound system, elegant tables and chairs,
a well-stocked and gleaming bar and a first-class selection of CDs, vinyls
and books for sale.
It wasn't always this way; about thirty years ago, new music in general
and improvised music in particular were not supported to this extent,
and it was largely thanks to the actions of a few stubborn and strong-willed
individuals that things began to change. Their names are now familiar:
Louis Andriessen, Reinbert de Leeuw, Peter Schat, Misha Mengelberg, and
Willem Breuker. Of these, Andriessen and Schat are highly regarded as
composers, de Leeuw is well-known as both pianist and conductor, Mengelberg
is now finally getting some attention, but Breuker's fame may not have
spread that far outside Holland, or outside the community of jazz and
improvised music afficionados. Bursting on the scene at the end of the
sixties, he cohabited with Misha Mengelberg and Han Bennink in the fractious
triumvirate that controlled the Instant Composers Pool, before breaking
off and forming his own band, the Kollektief, in 1974. It's going strong
nearly a quarter of a century later, with many of the original musicians-including
bassist Arjen Gorter, trumpeter Boy Raaymakers, trombonist Bernhard Hunnekink-still
in the line-up. As Breuker says: "I called my band the Kollektief..
it's a nonsense name from the '60s, a little bit socialistic. Everybody
in the band can say what he wants, and everyone earns the same. The books
are open. I take no salary, because I have money enough from my royalties
and commissions."
|
New Dutch Swingbook by Kevin Whitehead In the United States, a clear distinction is made
in academic music analysis between music theory (detailed discussion of
works concerned purely with intramusical considerations-the notes) and
musicology (setting the work in a wider cultural/historical context, showing
how various influences-musical and extramusical-shaped its creation and
subsequent reception-history). In considering jazz and other improvised
musics, the work of the music theorist is rendered problematic by the
absence of a score; true, some noble souls have spent countless hours
writing out solos by the likes of Monk, Miles, Trane and Dolphy, but such
transcriptions too few and far between to allow the analyst to reach any
general conclusions regarding individual players and styles. Writing about
jazz and its many derivatives tends therefore to be more musicological,
discussing influences, teachers and trends rather than the notes themselves.
Anecdote is an important element, for, as Cage rightly realised, an anecdote
can encapsulate in several sentences or images what might take paragraphs
to explain. As we move further away from academia towards the soundbite
world of music journalism, anecdote is ultimately all we have left: far
too few magazines take the time to interview musicians and reproduce faithfully
and respectfully what they have to say. Parts Two and Three consist essentially of interviews with major players-Ab Baars, Wolter Wierbos, Michael Moore, Ernst Reijseger, Guus Janssen, Paul Termos and so on-which, considered overall, knit together to weave the rich tapestry of the Amsterdam scene. Whitehead's background as jazz journalist (Down Beat, Village Voice) keeps the interviews up to speed and peppered with occasional expletives, but his racy journalese eventually begins to wear down even the most ardent reader: it took me twice as long to get through Part Three as it did Parts One and Two combined. I would even venture to suggest that he likes the music and the musicians too much; clearly in love with his adopted city, he seems at times to lack the little objectivity necessary in musicology. I'm just as big a fan of The Ex as he is (and love his description of them "pissing all over a wall a sound"), but I'm not sure we need to be told that guitarist Terrie Ex was given to punching him in the kidneys during their interview.. However, I well know the pitfalls of writing about musicians you admire, and I'm only too aware of my own mad love for Mengelberg's music sometimes impinging upon my supposed critical sense of detachment. We'll let you off, Kevin, also because, needless to say, the book includes a fine though far from comprehensive discography (several key early 70s Volhardings are absent, as are the old ICPs-perhaps because they're out of print?-and where is Gilius Van Bergeijk?) and an informative reading list to consult. After reading "New Dutch Swing" you only need one thing to complete your education: a table at the BIMhuis with a chilled beer and a side order of herring. [338pp, Billboard Books, 1515 Broadway NY, NY, USA 10036 $21.95]
|